ゼロに関して色々と怪しげな事を言う人達がいる。ただ、言いたくなる気持ちは分かる。それくらい不思議な数。
CHAPTER2 WHOLE NUMBERS || CLASS 6 MATHS || CLOSURE PROPERTY OF WHOLE NUMBERS AND DIVISION BY ZEROCHAPTER2 WHOLE NUMBERS || CLASS 6 MATHS || CLOSURE PROPERTY OF WHOLE NUMBERS AND DIVISION BY ZEROSUBSCRIBE THE CHANNEL NOW https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_FJynJuIjT56DMIk0YB-xw?sub_confirmation=1LAUGHTER THERAPY PLAYLIST-https://www.youtube.com/watch?…www.youtube.com
E=Mc2: What Does Einstein’s Most Famous Equation
2021年05月27日(木)NEW !
テーマ：物理学E=mc2: What Does Einstein’s Most Famous Equation Mean?Albert Einstein’s simple yet powerful equation revolutionized physics by connecting the mass of an object with its energy for the first time.www.discovermagazine.com
yeah Tower of Babylon was great, but Understand, Division by Zero, and Story of Your Life all seemed to fall into this pitfall I’m thinking of to greater or lesser degrees (and honestly I’m only halfway through the one collection so that’s about all I’ve read so far)
『地獄とは神の不在なり』『ゼロで割る』を読んだ
『ゼロで割る』の原題（“Division by Zero”）、中々に深い命名ですよね
Calculus Lecture 22 | Zero over Zero Calculus Lecture 22 | Zero over ZeroSponsored by Brilliant; Website: http://barisciencelab.tech/www.youtube.com
私は、間もなく 神の啓示 を受けて、 数学、人間、世界について語り出すだろう。数学と人間、生命への 愛から。新世界史を 拓くだろう。
I will* resist making reference to George Berkeley’s observations about the impossibility of division by zero in my staffing request this year (2 retirements + new hire coming in fall + I’m contractually in English means *technically* now the major/faculty ratio is a/0). *maybe
zero divided by zero
2021年05月11日(火)NEW !
テーマ：数学
zero divided by zero zero divided by zerowww.youtube.com
Universe divided by zero
BLACK HOLES ARE WHERE GOD IS DIVIDED BY ZERO.
ゼロ除算は 定義が問題です。分数で書けば、その分数の意味をきちんと与える必要が有ります。
代数的な定義や、解析的な定義、新しい定義の意義なども明らかにして 著書さえ 出版しています：
Divide By Zero upgrades all its FFF 3D Printers with Intelligent Auto-Switchover System
https://manufactur3dmag.com/divide-by-zero-upgrades-all-its-fff-3d-printers-with-intelligent-auto-switchover-system/
Division by zero wiki
It’s not entirely a bug. It’s done to prevent division by zero. Common practice in such things, but we could probably improve that.
人間により全人類を幸福にするよう命じられたコンピュータが、幸福な人の割合を評価関数とした結果、幸福でない人を”削除”することで分母を減らすと最大化できることに気づき、幸福でない人を片っ端から”削除”していき、最終的に分母が0になってゼロ除算でコンピュータ自身も動かなくなってしまうSF
https://twitter.com/voyage1970/status/1380384773978218497 再生核研究所声明 616(2021.4.10) 今こそ、日本数学会は、日本国は、世界の文化に貢献できる。
気持ち良い新緑、若葉の季節を迎えた。 表記のような構想が 美しい自然に刺激を受けてひらめいて来た。 一気に纏めてみたい。 率直にである。
そもそも数学とは論理の基本的な構造でできていて 神秘的な存在で、 その存在は世に絶対という概念が有るとすれば 数学界 くらいではないだろうか：
No.81, May 2012(pdf 432kb)
http://www.jams.or.jp/kaiho/kaiho-81.pdf
その論理構造を見れば、数学の価値判断は、そんなに難しいことではない。 論理構造を見れば、基本的なものが良く、社会に大きな良い影響を与えるものほど良いのは 当然であると考えられる。 数学の構造に基本的な寄与を与えるもの、世の思想や活用で大きな貢献をするものである。 ー それゆえに 数学の成果の評価を AIが相当良く行う時代が来るだろう。 その様な意味で、価値ある数学の例として、多くの人が知っている ピタゴラスの定理 や 少し、 高級になるが オイラーの公式 などが挙げられる（数学とは何かとともに 上記の解説に詳説）。
今、それらに匹敵できる新しい数学として、ゼロ除算とゼロ除算算法が 考えられると思われる。アリストテレス以来とされる 2300年以上の歴史を有する ゼロで割る問題、ゼロ除算は、ゼロ除算算法の概念で その本質が解明された。それは、数学の不完全性を補完し、完全化させるばかりではなく、厖大な新世界を開拓する。
これらが、数学の基礎に甚大な影響を与えるのは、既に歴然である。数学の基本、四則演算の基礎、欠けたる部分を補完し、従来考えてはならないとされてきた、解析関数の孤立特異点で 固有の値をとるという、新世界を開拓したからである。 それゆえに例外扱いや、不格好な数学を完全化させ、美しい世界を拓いているからである。
どうしてそのような 言わば大それたことが言えるだろうか。 それは 数学そのものの構造を 繰り返し検討し、7年を越えて 広く議論し、意見を求め、日々修行をし、検討を続けてきて、確信に至ったものである。 数学の名誉にかけて、数学者の名誉にかけて そう言明するのは、数学者としての良心であり、義務であると考える。 真実はそこに 歴然として有る。
この間 現在に至るも ぼんやりと 古い考えに拘っている数学者が結構存在するのを知っているが 人間の性（サガ）で 思い込みから抜けられないのは、初恋に命をかけてしまったような人間の心を表していると考える。 もはや新しい世界観を受け入れられない心情。
どうして、世界に貢献できるか、 それは 数学を美しく完全化させ、 未知の世界を拓くからである。 実は新しい数学が、人生観、世界観、生命観に甚大な影響を与え、 人間の魂、精神の開放にも繋がる新思想を齎すことは 既に歴然である。 このような影響にも 段段に具体的に触れて行きたい。
しかしながら、もっと手短に、ゼロ除算算法で、 世の教科書、学術書の変更が行われ、
ー 典型的な例は：
1/0=0/0=z/0=\tan(\pi/2) =\log 0 =0, [(z^n)/n]_{n=0} = \log z, [e^{(1/z)}]_{z=0} = 1;
For the elementary functions, f(x) = 1/x, g(x) = tan x and h(n)= a^n/n (a > 0), we have:
f(0)=0, g(\pi/2) = 0 and h(0) = log a,
by the DBZC (division by zero calculus)、
世界の計算機が ゼロ除算回避 どころか、ゼロ除算を可能にして、新世界を拓くという 大きな歴然とした影響が 必然的に出て来ると考える ー 令和革新の大義。
コロナ禍で世界の世相は暗い、そのような中で、ゼロ除算の解明は、世界史上の事件であり、世界を震撼させて 人間を開放するのに大いに貢献すると考えられる。
それゆえに 日本数学会も、日本国も ゼロ除算の解明を 認識し、世界にその意義を明かにし、紹介、活用することによって、世界の文化への 貢献に邁進したい。
世界貢献が、少ない予算、経費、労力でできる絶好の機会であると考える。 コロナ禍とオリンピック開催の不安を払拭して 日本国を 輝かせたい。 明るい 驚嘆すべきニュースを日本から 世界に発信したい。
世界の人々は、数学の美しさと、神秘さに深い思いを 歓びに満ちて 致すことができるだろう。その時、人間は人間を知るだろう。夜明けである。
以 上
硬貨大のブラックホールが地球を破壊する
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a2c5a8d83e0a513d4d91d8d417865838b4fdd065
And what happens, if now somebody would say the opposite followed by “FACT”. Would that be like a division by zero and lead to the universe imploding, because of the paradoxon created? Anyone wanna try?
Apprendre avec YouTube #205 : Scilabus, Scienticfiz, Norbert Explique Tout, Nota Bene…
「従来の算術のゼロ除算の矛盾は、1という絶対的な基準を作ったことに始まる。しかし、すべては相対的な値です。 相対的な1に対して、0との間の相対値(比)、つまり割り算1/0を求めることがそもそも論理矛盾です。
ゼロで割るという 考え方に本質的な問題がありました。 実は、簡単で 自然な ゼロで割る定義があり、それは数学そのもの の変革、革新をもたらします。詳しい解説も日本語で行っています：ゼロ除算は 実は簡単でした。しかし、結構 本質的な問題が有って、分からない人には 中々 分らないようです
再生核研究所声明 549(2020.2.26) 数学は、発見か 発明か － 回答
再生核研究所声明 615(2021.3.31) ゼロで割れるか、割れないか？ ー 考え方
ゼロ除算、ゼロで割る新しい考え方を発表して 7年も経過したにも関わらず 理解が進まない状況がある。相当に膨大な解説がなされている：
数学基礎学力研究会公式サイト 楽しい数学
http://www.mirun.sctv.jp › ~suugaku
－ 「ゼロ除算」研究の軌跡 －
堪らなく楽しい数学－ゼロで割ることを考える(1)～(55)
群馬大学名誉教授 斎藤 三郎
理解の仕方、誤解の仕方は 多様だから、表現方法もいろいろ考える必要がある。
この問題の本質は 関数 y= 1/x の原点での値を 考えることであった。 その関数の 原点の 値がゼロであることの発見が、ゼロ除算を発展させた、ゼロ除算算法の 本質であると言える。
ところで、ゼロで割れるか否かを 問題にするとき、 その意味, 定義がしっかりしなければ、数学的な議論は 始まらない。 定義である。そもそも割り算、分数 b/a; b 割るa の意味、定義は何だろうか。 それは 方程式 a x = b の解であると考えるのが、数学であり、世の常識であると考えられる （定義だから、いろいろな定義、考え方が存在する）。 直ぐに分かるように、a=0 の時 b=0 であるから、a=0 の時 b=0 以外は考えられない、
分数は 考えられない、ゼロで割ることはできないという 確立した 永い間の 定説、数学界の原理である。 ゼロでは 定義により 一般に割れない、ゼロで割ることは一般には考えてはならない。 ー 数学十戒第１。
ところが、方程式 a x = b は a=0 の場合にも 何時でも 唯一つに定まる解が存在するとする理論が、考え方があって それが有名なMoore-Penrose 一般逆の考え方である。それによると a=0 の時の解は b によらず 解はゼロであること が導かれる。割り算を定義する方程式の解が どのような場合にも唯一つ存在するのだから、その一般的な解をもって割り算を定義しようとの 自然な発想に繋がる。 できないものを、不可能なものを、存在しないものを 考え方を一般化して、可能にしたり、存在する様にしてきた数学の歴史は多い。 概念、考え方の一般化である。
その意味で考えれば、ゼロ除算は可能であるということになる。 ゼロで割れるか、割れないか は 定義による、考え方による。
不可能では、その場合には、更に考える余地は無く、おしまい である。 ゼロで割ってはいけない、それは考えてはいけない。 おしまい である。
ところが、ゼロ除算を可能にするような考え方が しっかりとした理論として存在する。 それでは 考えられる世界の様子はどうなるだろうかと 興味、関心を懐けば、未知の世界が現れてくることになる。 その結果 その世界は、幻の、空虚な世界ではなく、
アリストテレス、ユークリッドの世界以来の 新世界を拓くことを 発見した。あまりに雄大に影響を受け 美しい世界を拓くので、 我々は割り算の意味を 新規に発見したように考えるべきである と宣言して、 ゼロ除算は可能で 新世界を拓き、従来の数学には欠陥があり、恥ずかしい数学であると宣言している。 ー 令和革新の大義。
関数 y= 1/x の原点での値が ゼロであるとは、書けば 1/0=0 と表現される。 1/0 を従来の分数の定義とすれば 明かに矛盾である。 そこで、1/0 の 新しい意味を厳密に与える必要があり、さらにその有効性を沢山の具体例で 証拠として示す必要がある。
それがゼロ除算算法の数学の概念である。
典型的に 次のように具体例が表現され、その意義の重大さは 歴然であると考える：
For the elementary functions, f(x) = 1/x, g(x) = tan x and h(n)= a^n/n (a > 0), we have:
f(0)=0, g(\pi/2) = 0 and h(0) = log a,
by the DBZC (division by zero calculus).
ゼロ除算算法とは、従来特異点として、特異点では 考えてはならないところで、考えられて 極とされたところで、何時でも有限確定値を取っていたということで、新数学である。
上記の関数値は 基本的なのに 特異点で、値が考えられなかった。
我々は その演算の有効性を広く導いている：
現代数学には尚、欠陥がある と公言している。 関数論も、微分方程式も、幾何学も、代数も 基本的な欠陥があるのは 歴然で 発見後8年目を迎えてしまった。これは、世界史の汚点になるだろう：
Please look 1/0=0:
As Fundamental of Mathematics, the division by zero was known as the generalized Moore-Penrose solution of the fundamental equation: ax=b.
Look the simple evidence of its importance:
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
Look a simple video talk for its essence at some international conference:
https://media.cmd.gunma-u.ac.jp/media/Play/ef7ca967c3fd4dabb188128fd6038cb81d
Book was published:
INTRODUCTION TO THE
DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS
SABUROU SAITOH
January, 2021
https://www.scirp.org/book/DetailedInforOfABook.aspx?bookID=2746
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1649970889?ref=myi_title_dp
https://books.google.com.ua/books/about?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ
https://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/reproducingkerne/
以 上
再生核研究所声明 614(2021.3.28) 数学通信の記事の修正を求める理由、日本の文化、数学界の様子、社会の様子； 日本数学会、マスコミ関係者の皆さま、これで良いでしょうか。
要するに日本数学会の1つの機関誌の 数学の内容の修正を 正規に要求しているものの無視され続けている現状がある。 この実情を参考に関係問題について より良い社会を築こうとして発表している再生核研究所声明の趣旨に従って言及したい。
まずは、日本数学会、マスコミ関係者の皆さま 日本では 言論の自由が 良く保証されていますね。少数意見なども 良く取り上げられ 権力的な また一部の人達によって 一部の人達の情報の扱いにされていませんね。 出身や地位、生い立ち、性別、出身大学などいろいろな違いで、意見が無視されたりは されてはいないですね。 組織や仲間の事は もちろん大事ですが、基本的には、国や世界のために、という、言わば社会のためにという、基本的な姿勢を取られていますね。少数意見には貴重な意見が反映されている場合も多いと思われますが、貴重な意見を取り上げるような努力もされていますね。
数学通信、編集員会への手紙 では、日本数学会への提言、数学教育など数学界に関係する提言、ご意見を編集員会への手紙欄へ投稿することができますとうたっていますが、採用されたことはあるのでしょうか。 採否は通知しませんとは 原則尊重で、採択が 原則ではないでしょうか。 下手に扱えば検閲に当たってしまうのではないでしょうか。理由も付けずに採否では、少数意見の尊重にはならないのではないでしょうか。その投稿規定は 何のために有るのでしょうか。
数学や数学界の名誉のために という観点から触れている問題は 大事ではないでしょうか。
良い社会、良い国家を 築くために、 また 数学の真実を 明かにして 世界の文化に 貢献したいという 存念で 発表している 声明
再生核研究所声明 613(2021.3.21) 数学界の恥ずかしい間違い、天才たちの見落とし、人々の思い込み； 人類とは盲目集団で、単細胞的集団であるように見える
等を どうして無視されるのでしょうか。それは 大事な内容ではないでしょうか。真偽を明かにして欲しい。
意味が無いから 小さいから 無視されていると考えられます。それゆえに 日々、広く内外の意見を求め、反省と検討を 続けています。
逆に、私たちには、どうでもよい研究や情報に溢れているように見えてしまいます。
触れた記事内容は、鏡像が 原点か 無限遠点かの問題で 数学の歴然とした結果の真偽を まず、明らかにする様に要求しています。それは、象徴的な実例で、ところがその数学は 永い数学の歴史的な問題、ゼロ除算の新しい発見と、数学全般の基礎に関わる極めて重要な内容ですので、無視できないものです。その背景には、既に 発見後7年も経ち、繰り返し日本数学会で講演し、招待国際会議でも講演、ある招待国際会議のビデオ講演も公開し、論文どころか その著書さえ出版されています。それらでは 数学通信の数学内容が間違いであることを意味する 解説さえ述べられています。その事実を否定する内容に 数学通信の記事がなっていると考えます。このことは 世界の数学界ばかりではなく、人類の恥であると 繰り返し、述べています。
ですから、その真偽を求めるは、数学者として当然であると考えます。
ゼロ除算の理解の遅れの状況の理由について 率直な印象を 世界の文化の向上の観点から触れたい。
ゼロ除算は、まずは不可能であるとの強い印象で、思い込みで、初めから拒否の印象が 強く、独断、思い込みから抜けられない人間の性（サガ）が現れている。自由な思考が大事な数学で 逆に思い込みが 深い。
途中で分っても 誤りを直すことをためらい、誤りを認めたり、批判しておきながら謝罪しない現実がある。なかには 良く知らないで、隠れて批判したり、都合が悪くなると沈黙してしまう 言わば、卑怯者のような対応を取られる方も結構多い。相当な人と交流してきたが、率直に誤りを認めた方は少なく、更に謝罪された方は更に少ない。それで、今でもインターネットの世界では不適当な情報で溢れていると考えられる。世の常識は 数学界の汚点であると考える：
{\it Here is how I see the problem with prohibition on division by zero,
which is the biggest scandal in modern mathematics as you rightly pointed
out} (2017.10.14.08:55).
そのような状況は、数学界とマスコミ界の怠慢、恥になると考えます。
大事な盲点であったと 良く理解された方が、数学を進化させるべきだとは 積極的には働きかけず、次の世代の問題と消極的である。 ー これはあまりにも大きな変更になるので、という面と 理解の深さに欠けているためと考えられる。ー 変更は簡単であるが、学術書の変更は厖大になる。 新規の数学で欠けたる部分が補充されるから、新しい結果を含めなくても 修正は厖大になる。しかし、真理を知っても 活かさない。 ー 義をみてせざるは勇なきなり。真智への愛の弱さ、真理を、真実を尊ぶ心の弱さ を感じてしまう。
残念ながら、課題のためか、無名のためか、数学の内容を見ることなく、無視されてしまう、初めから相手にされない現実もある。確かにゼロ除算の文献は 殆どすべてがおかしいものが 多いことと、不可能性は確定的だから、初めから、問題にしない気持ちは良くわかる。しかしながら、 非ユークリッド幾何学の発見のような場合もあり、実際、正しく、そのような場合に当たると考えられる。 ー しかし、数学自身を見るべきで 人で判断するのは 本質的に良くないのではないでしょうか。それでは科学的な精神に 本質的に欠けると言わざるを得ない。また、多様な意見や、変った意見、新奇な意見の尊重は 研究者の基本的な在りよう ではないでしょうか。
また、真理の追究のために、徹底的に議論するは 大事な研究の基本的な精神のはずですが、直ぐに議論を停止して、興味ない、関心ない、交流を断絶させる、相手の意見を無視するは 良くない世相ではないでしょうか。真実を求めて、徹底的に議論、交流するは 研究上極めて基本的な在りようではないでしょうか。
どうも数学界でも面子争い、競争意識、仲間利益の意識が強く、驚くべきことに 数学の真理の追究を越えて、数学界を 良くなくしているような世相を感じる。数学界こそ 真智への愛の精神が 大事ではないでしょうか。徹底的に 数学の真相を求めて行きたい。数学界は社会に開かれていなければならないと考える。
最近、東工大で 院生時代、修業時代、受けた 小松勇作先生、小沢満先生、吹田先生達のセミナーの情景がしきりに思い出される。一言で表現すれば、数学の厳格精神で、徹底的に鍛えられた、懐かしい修行時代である。 このようなだらしのない数学の状況、数学界の対応では 恩師たちに 申し訳が立たず、名誉が保てない と現状について 激しい思いが絶えず湧いてくる。
令和革新を 断行して 今こそ、日本発のゼロ除算算法で 世界史を進化させたい。アリストテレス、ユークリッド以来の空間の考えは改められ、微積分学も修正されなければならない。三角関数も穴だらけと言える。顕著な具体例が 原点の鏡像は原点であって、無限遠点ではないという事実にある。
ブログから：
真偽を明らかにできない数学会とは 何をするところか。
間違っていることを修正できないで、数学の研究者、数学の先生 と言えるでしょうか。
これを修正しない数学界は 毎日恥をかいているようだ。 目覚めて少し、激しい感情が 湧いてきた。 修業のため 隠れ家に早めに行こう。
２０２１．３．２６．５：０２
無限遠点、無限の先に ゼロが存在した。 気づかなかった。
小さな問題に見えるが、天地がひっくり変えるような、天動説が地動説に代わるような 世界史上の事件であることは 既に 歴然である。
２０２１．３．２５．５：２８
以 上
再生核研究所声明 613(2021.3.21) 数学界の恥ずかしい間違い、天才たちの見落とし、人々の思い込み； 人類とは盲目集団で、単細胞的集団であるように見える
ゼロ除算の理解の遅れは全く不思議で、その理由について思いを巡らしている。まずは、ゼロ除算の最も原理的なところの解説を、本質を解説する。
基本的な関数 y=1/x の 原点における値 が ゼロである という発見が ゼロ除算の発見の 本質と言えます。
何と その基本関数の 原点での値がゼロだ というのです。
その関数は、正の方向から原点に近づくと 無限大に発散し、負の方向から ゼロに近づくと マイナス無限大に 発散しています。
それらは 事実で、 現代数学も当然 そうなっています。
しかし、それらは原点に近づくときの 様子を述べていますが、それらは、
原点での値が どうの こうのとは 一応違った問題です。 いくら原点に近づいても 原点での値が どうかは 別問題です。 いわゆる 連続性が成り立っているとか、そのようなことは 分りません。 それで 原点での 値を考えてきませんでした。 ぼんやり無限大のようなことを発想してきました。 複素解析学などでは 無限遠点を考えてきましたが、原点での値が 数のように無限大とするのは、そもそもおかしい。 値が 数ではないものと 等号で結ぶのは、 本当は おかしいと言えます。等号は数でなければならないのではないでしょうか。1/0=INFINITY は 本当におかしい。
実際、天才 オイラーの間違いとして 既に有名です。 ゼロ除算は 1/0=0 と言っていますから、多くの人には驚嘆で、実際、聞いて、表情を変えられたのは 国内外、欧米、アジア、ロシア、アフリカ、南米、アラブの人たちも同様です。 しかしながら、1/0 の新しい意味が与えられる必要がありました。 それがゼロ除算の 新しい概念、意味です。 近づく値と、近づいたところの値を 長い間混同し、曖昧にしてきたのが ゼロ除算の 大事な観点、盲点だったと言える。 良く知られているように ゼロ除算は普通の意味では不可能性が簡単に証明されてしまうので、世の天才 ニュートン、アインシュタイン、オイラー、ガウス すら ゼロ除算の本質は捉えることができませんでした。 天才 ラマノジャンは 0/0 = 1 ではないと直観していたが、ゼロ除算の意味は 捉えられなかった。
肝心な点なので、ある人とのメールを参考に、理解を深めるために引用したい：
まず、関数とその極限の基本事項として、f(z)=1/z （z≠0）とおくとき、
f(z) は z=0 で定義されておらず、極限としてlim_(z→0) f(z) = ∞ は明らかです。
このとき、z=0 での値を新たに定義して拡張された関数を定義する場合、
z=0 において どのような関数値をとるかは自由です。
関数論でリーマン面を考えた場合、連続性や等角性にとって便利なように
f(0)=∞ と定義するのは自然です。(1/0=∞)
一方、先生がご提唱されているように、いろいろな応用を考えた場合、
f(0)=0 と定義した理論も重要です。(1/0=0)
これが大事ですが、ム-アペンローズ一般逆、高橋の一意性定理、体の構造、１１００を超える具体例は 数学が、1/0=0 の定義と意味を与えているのは歴然です。
その考えは極めて簡単に記述されて 内容も定義も簡単です。
レヴェルで 小学生から、当たり前です。 割り算の定義、意味をちょっと考え直すだけです。
それゆえに 数学が恥ずかしい状態だと言っています。
これは、数学界の恥だけではなく 人類の、世界史の恥です。
上記で、z=0 において どのような関数値をとるかについて f(0)=∞ と定義するのは自然です は： 値を数でない∞とするのは、おかしいです。 それは、lim_(z→0) f(z) = ∞の意味で、 極限操作を考えなければ、∞は 意味がないと言えます。∞の定義を思い出す必要があります。
円の中心の 円に関する鏡像が 中心自身であることを意味しますが、それを無限大や、無限遠点とは やってはいけない 考えてはいけないことは 解析学における、 数学教育の基本に当たります。 なぜなら、近づいていった値と そこでの値は、一般に違うことが 極限の考え方で、基本的に 大事だからです。 ところが鏡像では、 みんな気づかず 永い期間 曖昧にして、
ぼんやりして来ました。
不幸にして、原点に近づいていった値と、原点での値は違っていて、原点では
似つかない、驚くべき数、ゼロが定義されていた。
アリストテレス以来とも 言える。このことをきちんと指摘しても、７年間も修正されず、日本数学会 数学通信に 従来の古い間違いの事実を 正規に指摘しても 1年以上経っても無視を続けていられる有様です。 函数論分科会でもそうです。 何か みんな嫌な世界を見るように 避けるような態度を取られているのは、数学者らしくはない態度で、それでは数学の教育と研究に責任を持つ方がおられないように感じられてしまいます。 われわれは数学の真偽を明かにするように求めています。われわれの教えている数学には 基本的な欠陥があり、恥ずかしい状態であると 繰り返し述べているのに 無視されている状況が存在する。われわれは数学者の良心から、数学の美しさの名において 真相を明かにしていかなければならない ー 令和革新の大義。
理解が進まないのは、どうしてか と思い巡らしてきたが、自分の専門に深くはまり、単細胞的な思考と視野に閉ざされて、基本的なことに 気が周らないような状況が感じられます。 忙しく、心を失っていて、そのような状態で良い教育や、研究が できるのだろうか と考えてしまいます。
ゼロ除算は古い歴史を有する 有名な問題ですが、 世の秀才、天才は多いのですが、ひとたび不可能であるとされると、天才たちもすっかりその様に思い込み、その思考から抜けられない人間の性（サガ）を知らされます。 それゆえに、素人の意見など 広く参考にすることが 大事ではないでしょうか。 実際、私たちの発見は、素人の方の質問が、大きなきっかけになっています。
数学の世界は、政治社会等と違って 数学的真実は 客観的に 絶対的に存在していると考えれますので、数学としてどうか、真理の追究の立場から、真相を明かにして欲しい と願っています。
現状の数学は、恥ずかしい状態で、社会の扱いも 対応も恥ずかしいものであると、 ちょうど地動説を否定して、無視したり、批判していた世相に似ていると考えられます。人は、数学的な真実を求めるべきではないでしょうか。その問題は どうでもよい数学ではなく、数学の基本と世界観が直接関わっているのは歴然です。 永遠や無限は、どうなっているでしょうか。
以 上
再生核研究所声明 612(2021.3.19) 我々は発見した ― 数学の初歩的な結果
我々は、自然な意味で、ゼロで割れることを発見した。
我々は、無限大はゼロで表されることを発見した。
我々は、真っ直ぐに立った電柱の勾配がゼロであることを発見した。
我々は、ｙ軸の勾配がゼロであることを発見した。
我々は、直角双曲線の中心での値が、中心の値をとることを発見した。
我々は、特異点で 意味のある値をとることを発見した。
我々は、無限の彼方が 原点に一致していることを発見した。
我々は、無限の先にゼロがあることを発見した。
我々は、全てはゼロから始まってゼロに帰することを発見した。
我々は、円の中心の 円に関する鏡像が 中心自身であることを発見した。
我々は、ゼロには不可能を現す性質があることを発見した。
我々は、ゼロが 存在しないことを現す場合もあることを発見した。
我々は、ユークリッド幾何学には、無限の彼方の考えに欠陥があることを発見した。
我々は、直線も 点も、 中心が原点で、曲率がゼロの円とみなせることを発見した。
我々は、ゼロ除算算法 DBZC という 基本的な演算の概念と 言葉を発見した。 それを著書に出版した：
INTRODUCTION TO THE
DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS
SABUROU SAITOH
January, 2021
https://www.scirp.org/book/DetailedInforOfABook.aspx?bookID=2746
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1649970889?ref=myi_title_dp
https://books.google.com.ua/books/about?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ
これらは気持ちで、感情的に 素人向きに、一般向きに 表現したものである。 正確、厳密には 上記著書で 自己完結に記述されていると考える。
以 上
再生核研究所声明 609 (2021.3.11): 複素数と円の幾何 － 島根大 中西俊浩氏の解説について（数学通信 2020年2月号） 記述の修正を求める
ここで、記述とは 円に関する 中心の鏡像を 無限遠点としているのを、
中心の鏡像は 中心自身であるとの記述に改めて欲しいとの、要求です。
詳しい背景は、
再生核研究所声明551(2020.3.8) 函数論分科会の皆様 —
今の学部函数論テキスト、教育内容には基本的な欠陥があると考えます。
と
再生核研究所声明 606(2021.3.1) : 新世界は拓かれた、新世界の探検を求める：
From Riemann sphere to Daeumler – Puha horn torus; 2021.2.22.5:33
or
From Euclid – Riemann to Daeumler – Puha horn torus model; 2021.2.22.07:30
を参照。 検討の依頼は 著者本人及び、編集責任者 「数学通信」編集委員長 徳永浩雄氏に伝えられ（Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:22:54 +0900）編集委員会にて諮りますと回答されたが、以後一切連絡を受けていない。
修正依頼の理由について心情は：
数学者が 間違いを修正しないはずは無いから、 数学会が間違いを修正しないのは、 どちらでもあり得ると 誤解している、 間違いの理解をしているため と 考えられる。
だから、真相を明らかにして欲しい。 関係者の 数学者の名誉と 義務 職務に反していると考える。
春の美しい朝、東工大で 小松勇作先生、小沢先生、吹田先生の 出席される 高級なセミナーで 数学の精神は鍛えられた。 先生たちは充実した年代で、結構な数学者、 東大の及川先生等も よく参加、更に当時助手と呼ばれていた人たちも一緒で 厳しいものだった。
私は、現状の関数論の在りようは おかしいと考えられると、そのような思いで 目を覚ました。 どうして こんなことが明らかにできないのだろうか。 どうして 真実を求めない。 明らかにしない。 鏡像の古典的な考えは 間違いであり、 現代数学の基礎には 基本的な欠陥がある。 真相を究めて欲しい。 それができないで 数学者と言えるだろうか。 私は 我々の受けた数学の精神に掛けて、それは許せない。それは研究者の 譲れない 良心である。 ２０２１．３．６．５：２５（ブログに公開）。
ゼロ除算は発見されて7年を経過し、日本数学会でも 繰り返し講演、学会ごとにできる限り個別にも会ってゼロ除算の理解を求めてきた。 それで正当な批判は世界のどこからも無く、招待国際会議のビデオ講演を公開し、 著書も出版されている。 しかしながら、今でも相当な人が上記に述べているような誤解をされている状況が 広くみられる。 単に鏡像の問題だけでは なく、世界観や基礎数学全般の基本に関わるので、日本数学会として、きちんと真相を明かにし、事実の認定を行うは、数学の研究と教育に責任を担う機関として、基本的な義務になると考えます。
私は、数学者の良心に掛けて、真相の究明を続け、数学の名誉に掛けて、令和革新の大義 に努力したい。
尚、結果は ISAAC 2015, Macauでの Plenary Lectures で特別に言及され、正規に出版されている：
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182. (Springer).
以 上
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\title{\bf Announcement 600: The 7th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$ \\
(2021.2.2)\\ For Founding a new International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus
}
\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\
Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\
Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\
{\bf kbdmm360@yahoo.co.jp}\\
}
\date{2021.1.26.}
\maketitle
The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space since Aristotele (BC384 – BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century – ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta (598 – 668 ?).
However, note that the division by zero $1/0=0$ having a mysterious long history was, in fact, known as the generalized Moore-Penrose solution of the fundamental equation: $ax=b$.
\medskip
The division by zero calculus is a new and fundamental concept, and it may be defined simply as follows:
\medskip
For a function $y = f(x)$ which is $n$ order differentiable at $x =a$, we will {\bf define} the value
of the function, for $n \ge 0$
$$
\frac{f(x)}{(x -a)^n}
$$
at the point $x=a$ by the value
$$
\frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}.
$$
For the important case of $n=1$,
$$
\frac{f(x)}{x -a} |_{x=a} = f^\prime(a).
$$
\medskip
Look the simple evidence of its importance:
\medskip
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
\medskip
Look a simple video talk for its essence at some international conference:
\medskip
https://media.cmd.gunma-u.ac.jp/media/Play/ef7ca967c3fd4dabb188128fd6038cb81d
\medskip
For the detailed information, the book will be published soon as:
\medskip
S. Saitoh, Introduction to the Division by Zero Calculus, Scientific Research Publishing (2021) (in press).
\medskip
Some publisher of London is wishing some publication of a new International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus. The topics may be identified as the division by zero calculus. However, the contents will be related to our serious problems:
\medskip
What is ZERO?
\medskip
What is Division by Zero, in some serious sense?
\medskip
The problems may be related to mathematical philosophy, long history and our culture.
The starting of the International Journal will not be still easy at this moment, however, for its importance, we would like to manage to found the new Journal in some near future. So, we will need the kind help of the leading mathematical scientists.
\medskip
How will be the related physicists?
\medskip
Computer scientists?
\medskip
We attached the journal style (in a rough way) in the below. You can express your positive suggestions and comments for the style.
For your great contributions in connection with this topics, how will be your editorial member?
However, the final decision may be done by the publisher.
We wish to have your positive answer with your valuable suggestions and comments.
If you kindly are interested in the editorial member, then please send your simple CV with your wishes for some estimation by the publisher.
Please kindly forward this announcement to your related colleagues that you think suitable persons.
\bigskip
{\it For your starting email, I think as follows:
Many thanks for your email. The journals suggested by you are very interesting and new to the subject area. We accept to publish both journals under your editorship. We need following things from your side for preparing the sample web page of the journals.
1. Aim and Scope , Instructions to Authors, List of the editorial board members, Frequency of the journal.
Of course, they are important. However, for Frequency of the journal, we should consider it in a new type. We should not loss our valuable time for us and for the authors. We all do not like to loss our time for publication and refereeing time. This will mean that we should not fix Frequency of the journal. When a paper was accepted officially, then, soon the paper should be presented on line. So, some time, we can give the number for an accepted paper. If you wish to publish the papers in some Journal style or book, you will be able to publish them in some papers with a suitable page numbers. How will be this idea?
2. The journal will be free for the readers (open Access publications). The journal will not charge any fee from the authors for getting published in the journal.
Fine: However is it possible?
3. We need some sample images from your end to prepare the cover page for the journals.
We can consider them with computer graphics.
For a paper style, how will be it in a free style, we request it PDF in order not to
loss any valuable time for us and for the authors.
I think: this is an ideal style
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
The problem is no refereeing procedures. We are requested to have some authority, some check system for the paper. This is a problem only.
I think you will be able to consider new journals in this spirit.
The publisher already gave a very good sample manuscript form by LaTex; very simple way. No problem.
4. We will provide the support to the editor to check the plagiarism in the articles via turnitin software.
We will request minor corrections formally for the accepted paper.}
\bigskip
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{boyer}
C. B. Boyer, An early reference to division by zero, The Journal of the American Mathematical Monthly, {\bf 50} (1943), (8), 487- 491. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from the JSTOR database.
\bibitem{cs}
L. P. Castro and S. Saitoh, Fractional functions and their representations, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory {\bf7} (2013), no. 4, 1049-1063.
\bibitem{kmsy}
M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,
New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,
Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.
\bibitem{ms16}
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Matrices and division by zero $z/0=0$,
Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, {\bf 6}(2016), 51-58
Published Online June 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt
\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.
\bibitem{mms18}
T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,
$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics. {\bf 230} (2018), 293-305.
\bibitem{msy}
H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and M.Yamada,
Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1–8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html
\bibitem{mos}
H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,
International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, {\bf 2}8(2017); Issue 1, 1-16.
\bibitem{oku18}
H. Okumura, Is It Really Impossible To Divide By Zero? Biostat Biometrics Open Acc J. 2018; 7(1): 555703.
DOI: 10.19080/BBOJ.2018.07.555703.
\bibitem{o}
H. Okumura, Wasan geometry with the division by 0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06947 International Journal of Geometry. {\bf 7}(2018), No. 1, 17-20.
\bibitem{ok1812}
H. Okumura,
An Analogue to Pappus Chain theorem with Division by Zero, Forum Geom., {\bf 18} (2018), 409–412.
\bibitem{okumurafield}
H. Okumura, To Divide by Zero is to Multiply by Zero, viXra: 1811.0283 submitted on 2018-11-18 20:46:54.
\bibitem{okumura19a}
H. Okumura, A Remark of the Definition of $0/0=0$ by Brahmagupta, viXra:1902.0221 submitted on 2019-02-12 23:41:31.
\bibitem{okumura20}
H. Okumura, A Chain of Circles Touching a Circle and Its Tangent and Division by Zero,
viXra:2001.0034 submitted on 2020-01-03 01:08:58.
\bibitem{okumura20b}
H. Okumura, Pappus Chain and Division by Zero, viXra:2001.0123 replaced on 2020-01-08 06:57:36.
\bibitem{osm}
H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of $0$ and $\infty$,
Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), {\bf 1}(2017), 70-77.
\bibitem{os}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh, The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04961 (2017.11.14).
\bibitem{os18april}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Harmonic Mean and Division by Zero,
Dedicated to Professor Josip Pe\v{c}ari\'{c} on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Forum Geometricorum, {\bf 18} (2018), 155—159.
\bibitem{os18}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Remarks for The Twin Circles of Archimedes in a Skewed Arbelos by H. Okumura and M. Watanabe, Forum Geometricorum, {\bf 18}(2018), 97-100.
\bibitem{os18e}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Applications of the division by zero calculus to Wasan geometry.
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH ON CLASSICAL AND MODERN GEOMETRIES” (GJARCMG), {\bf 7}(2018), 2, 44–49.
\bibitem{os1811}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Wasan Geometry and Division by Zero Calculus,
Sangaku Journal of Mathematics (SJM), {\bf 2 }(2018), 57–73.
\bibitem{ps18}
S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,
Division by zero calculus and differential equations. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics. {\bf 230} (2018), 399-418.
\bibitem{romig}
H. G. Romig, Discussions: Early History of Division by Zero,
American Mathematical Monthly, {\bf 3}1, No. 8. (Oct., 1924), 387-389.
\bibitem{s14}
S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87–95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/
\bibitem{s16}
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182.
\bibitem{ttk}
S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi, Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.
\bibitem{ann179}
Announcement 179 (2014.8.30): Division by zero is clear as z/0=0 and it is fundamental in mathematics.
\bibitem{ann185}
Announcement 185 (2014.10.22): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann237}
Announcement 237 (2015.6.18): A reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$ by geometrical optics.
\bibitem{ann246}
Announcement 246 (2015.9.17): An interpretation of the division by zero $1/0=0$ by the gradients of lines.
\bibitem{ann247}
Announcement 247 (2015.9.22): The gradient of y-axis is zero and $\tan (\pi/2) =0$ by the division by zero $1/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann250}
Announcement 250 (2015.10.20): What are numbers? – the Yamada field containing the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann252}
Announcement 252 (2015.11.1): Circles and
curvature – an interpretation by Mr.
Hiroshi Michiwaki of the division by
zero $r/0 = 0$.
\bibitem{ann281}
Announcement 281 (2016.2.1): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann282}
Announcement 282 (2016.2.2): The Division by Zero $z/0=0$ on the Second Birthday.
\bibitem{ann293}
Announcement 293 (2016.3.27): Parallel lines on the Euclidean plane from the viewpoint of division by zero 1/0=0.
\bibitem{ann300}
Announcement 300 (2016.05.22): New challenges on the division by zero z/0=0.
\bibitem{ann326}
Announcement 326 (2016.10.17): The division by zero z/0=0 – its impact to human beings through education and research.
\bibitem{ann352}
Announcement 352 (2017.2.2): On the third birthday of the division by zero z/0=0.
\bibitem{ann354}
Announcement 354 (2017.2.8): What are $n = 2,1,0$ regular polygons inscribed in a disc? — relations of $0$ and infinity.
\bibitem{362}
Announcement 362 (2017.5.5): Discovery of the division by zero as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$
\bibitem{380}
Announcement 380 (2017.8.21): What is the zero?
\bibitem{388}
Announcement 388 (2017.10.29): Information and ideas on zero and division by zero (a project).
\bibitem{409}
Announcement 409 (2018.1.29.): Various Publication Projects on the Division by Zero.
\bibitem{410}
Announcement 410 (2018.1 30.): What is mathematics? — beyond logic; for great challengers on the division by zero.
\bibitem{412}
Announcement 412 (2018.2.2.): The 4th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{433}
Announcement 433 (2018.7.16.): Puha’s Horn Torus Model for the Riemann Sphere From the Viewpoint of Division by Zero.
\bibitem{448}
Announcement 448 (2018.8.20): Division by Zero;
Funny History and New World.
\bibitem{454}
Announcement 454 (2018.9.29): The International Conference on Applied Physics and Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, October 22-23.
\bibitem{460}
Announcement 460 (2018.11.06): Change the Poor Idea to the Definite Results For the Division by Zero – For the Leading Mathematicians.
\bibitem{461}
Announcement 461 (2018.11.10): An essence of division by zero and a new axiom.
\bibitem{471}
Announcement 471(2019.2.2): The 5th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{478}
Announcement 478(2019.3.4): Who did derive first the division by zero $1/0$ and the division by zero calculus $\tan(\pi/2)=0, \log 0=0$ as the outputs of a computer?
\bibitem{540}
Announcement 540(2020.2.2): The 6th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
prepare the article according to the sample style of the journal.
https://romanpub.com/dbzc.php
Thanks again,
#更新#0除算#2021年#2014年3月8日ゼロ除算算法の発見#再生核研究所#令和革新の推進0除算#ゼロ除算#2014年2月2日ゼロ除算の発見#2000年来の発見0除算再生核研究所#SNSAD
E=Mc2: What Does Einstein’s Most Famous Equation Mean?
Albert Einstein’s simple yet powerful equation revolutionized physics by connecting the mass of an object with its energy for the first time.
yeah Tower of Babylon was great, but Understand, Division by Zero, and Story of Your Life all seemed to fall into this pitfall I’m thinking of to greater or lesser degrees (and honestly I’m only halfway through the one collection so that’s about all I’ve read so far)
ZeroDivisionError division by zero
I read “Hell is the absence of God” and “Divid by zero”
The original title of “Divid by Zero” (“Division by Zero”) is a deep name, isn’t it?
Division by zero is actually natural from the meaning of zero:
[Ha !?] Paradox 0 to the 0th power problem [Slow commentary] #Slowly #Slow commentary #Slow math #Paradox #Slow science # 0 ÷ 0 Answer 0 is a cool name, isn’t it? Even so, if you divide 0 by 0, the more you think about problems such as (0 ÷ 0) and the factorial of 0 (0!), The more you will not understand. This time, the answer is different depending on the computer.
If Zero Will Not Exist Then What Will Happen? Please see In This Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2uFu6kHC8c
I found it very interesting:
"Singularity" is fantasy math, division by zero.
https://twitter.com/McComments/status/1393174832745943043
Calculus Lecture 22 | Zero over Zero
Calculus Lecture 22 | Zero over ZeroSponsored by Brilliant; Website:
I will soon receive the revelation of God and start talking about mathematics, humans, and the world. From love for mathematics, humans, and life. It will open up a new world history.
I will * resist making reference to George Berkeley's observations about the impossibility of division by zero in my staffing request this year (2 retirements + new hire coming in fall + I'm contractually in English means * technically * now the major / faculty ratio is a / 0). * maybe
zero divided by zero
Tuesday, May 11, 2021 NEW!
Theme: Mathematics
zero divided by zero
zero divided by zero
Universe divided by zero
https://twitter.com/marcmetmening/status/1388905489141059584
BLACK HOLES ARE WHERE GOD IS DIVIDED BY ZERO.
https://twitter.com/AmeyKatre/status/1389202348736598022
The definition of division by zero is a problem. If you write it in fractions, you need to give the meaning of the fractions properly.
He even published a book that clarified algebraic definitions, analytical definitions, and the significance of new definitions:
Divide By Zero upgrades all its FFF 3D Printers with Intelligent Auto-Switchover System
https://manufactur3dmag.com/divide-by-zero-upgrades-all-its-fff-3d-printers-with-intelligent-auto-switchover-system/
Division by zero wiki
It’s not entirely a bug. It’s done to prevent division by zero. Common practice in such things, but we could probably improve that.
Computers commanded by humans to make all human beings happy find that reducing the denominator by "removing" unhappy people can be maximized as a result of using the percentage of happy people as the merit function, and unhappy people. SF that "deletes" from one end, and finally the denominator becomes 0 and the computer itself does not work by division by zero
Statement of the Institute for Bionuclear Science 616 (2021.4.10) Now is the time for the Mathematical Society of Japan to contribute to the culture of the world.
We have reached the season of pleasant fresh green and young leaves. A concept like the notation was inspired by the beautiful nature. I want to put it all together at once. Frankly.
In the first place, mathematics is a mysterious existence that is made up of the basic structure of logic, and if there is a concept that its existence is absolute in the world, it would be about the mathematics world:
No.81, May 2012(pdf 432kb)
http://www.jams.or.jp/kaiho/kaiho-81.pdf
Looking at its logical structure, the value judgment of mathematics is not so difficult. Looking at the logical structure, it is natural that the basic ones are good and the ones that have a great positive impact on society are better. It makes a basic contribution to the structure of mathematics, and makes a great contribution to the ideas and utilization of the world. -Therefore, the time will come when AI will evaluate the results of mathematics fairly well. In that sense, examples of valuable mathematics include the Pythagorean theorem, which many people know, and Euler's formula, which is a little more expensive (detailed in the above explanation along with what mathematics is).
Now, it seems that division by zero and division by zero can be considered as new mathematics that can be compared with them. The problem of dividing by zero, which has a history of more than 2300 years since Aristotle, division by zero, has been clarified by the concept of division by zero. It not only complements and perfects the imperfections of mathematics, but also opens up a vast new world.
It is already clear that these have a tremendous impact on the basics of mathematics. This is because it has pioneered a new world in which the basics of mathematics, the basics of four arithmetic operations, and the missing parts are complemented, and unique values are taken at isolated singularities of analytic functions, which had been considered unthinkable in the past. Therefore, exception handling and clunky mathematics are perfected to open up a beautiful world.
How can we say such a big difference? It was convinced that the structure of mathematics itself was repeatedly examined, discussed extensively for over 7 years, solicited opinions, practiced daily, and continued to be examined. In the honor of mathematics, in the honor of mathematicians It is the conscience and duty of a mathematician to make such a statement. The truth is clearly there.
During this time, I know that there are quite a few mathematicians who are vaguely obsessed with old ideas, but it seems that my first love has been killed because of human nature (saga). Think of it as representing the human mind. A feeling that can no longer accept a new world view.
How can we contribute to the world, because it completes mathematics beautifully and opens up an unknown world. Actually, it is already clear that new mathematics has a great influence on the outlook on life, the world, and the outlook on life, and brings about a new idea that leads to the opening of the human soul and spirit. I would like to touch on such effects in detail.
However, in a shorter way, the textbooks and academic books of the world were changed by the division by zero method.
-A typical example is:
1/0=0/0=z/0=\tan(\pi/2) =\log 0 =0, [(z^n)/n]_{n=0} = \log z, [e^{(1/z)}]_{z=0} = 1;
For the elementary functions, f(x) = 1/x, g(x) = tan x and h(n)= a^n/n (a > 0), we have:
f(0)=0, g(\pi/2) = 0 and h(0) = log a,
by the DBZC (division by zero calculus)、
Instead of avoiding division by zero by computers around the world, I think that the big and obvious impact of enabling division by zero and opening up a new world will inevitably come out-the cause of Reiwa innovation.
The world is dark due to the corona, and the elucidation of division by zero is an event in the history of the world, and it is thought that it will greatly contribute to shaking the world and opening up human beings.
Therefore, both the Mathematical Society of Japan and Japan will recognize the elucidation of division by zero, clarify its meaning to the world, introduce it, and utilize it to contribute to the culture of the world.
We believe that contributing to the world is a great opportunity to make a small budget, expense and effort. I want to dispel the anxieties of the Corona and the Olympic Games and make Japan shine. I want to send bright and amazing news from Japan to the world.
People all over the world will be able to joyfully capture the beauty and mystery of mathematics. At that time, humans will know humans. It's dawn.
that's all
A coin-sized black hole destroys the earth
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a2c5a8d83e0a513d4d91d8d417865838b4fdd065
And what happens, if now somebody would say the opposite followed by “FACT”. Would that be like a division by zero and lead to the universe imploding, because of the paradoxon created? Anyone wanna try?
Apprendre avec YouTube #205 : Scilabus, Scienticfiz, Norbert Explique Tout, Nota Bene…
"The contradiction of division by zero in traditional arithmetic begins with the creation of the absolute criterion of 1. But all are relative values. Relative values between 1 and 0 (relative to 1). Ratio), that is, finding division 1/0 is a logical contradiction in the first place.
There was an essential problem with the idea of dividing by zero. Actually, there is a simple and natural definition of dividing by zero, which brings about the transformation and innovation of mathematics itself. Detailed explanations are also given in Japanese: Division by zero was actually easy. However, there are quite a few essential problems, and it seems that people who do not understand do not understand it.
Regeneration Nuclear Research Institute Statement 549 (2020.2.26) Is Mathematics a Discovery or an Invention? -Answer
Regenerative Nuclear Research Institute Statement 615 (2021.3.31) Will it break at zero or not? -Thinking
Even though it has been seven years since we announced a new concept of division by zero and division by zero, there are situations in which understanding has not progressed. There is a considerable amount of commentary:
Foundations of Mathematics Study Group Official Website Fun Mathematics
http://www.mirun.sctv.jp/~suugaku/
-The trajectory of "division by zero" research-
Unbearably Fun Mathematics-Thinking about dividing by zero (1)-(55)
Professor Emeritus of Gunma University Saburo Saito
There are various ways of understanding and misunderstanding, so it is necessary to think about various ways of expression.
The essence of this problem was to consider the value at the origin of the function y = 1 / x. It can be said that the discovery that the value of the origin of the function is zero is the essence of the division by zero method, which is an extension of division by zero.
By the way, when the question is whether or not it can be divided by zero, if the meaning and definition are not solid, the mathematical discussion will not start. It is a definition. In the first place, what is the meaning and definition of division, fraction b / a; b divide a? It is mathematics to think that it is the solution of the equation a x = b, and it is considered to be common sense in the world (because it is a definition, there are various definitions and ideas). As you can see immediately, when a = 0, b = 0, so it is unthinkable except when a = 0, b = 0.
Fractions are an established, long-established theory of mathematics that they are unthinkable and cannot be divided by zero. By definition, zero does not generally break, and dividing by zero should not be considered in general. -The Ten Commandments of Mathematics No. 1.
However, there is a theory that the equation a x = b has a unique solution at any time even when a = 0, which is the famous Moore-Penrose general opposite idea. According to it, the solution when a = 0 is derived that the solution is zero regardless of b. Since there is only one solution to the equation that defines division in any case, it leads to a natural idea of defining division with that general solution. There is a lot of history of mathematics that has made possible or exist by generalizing the idea of what cannot be done, what is impossible, and what does not exist. It is a generalization of concepts and ideas.
In that sense, division by zero is possible. Whether it breaks at zero or not breaks depends on the way of thinking by definition.
If it is impossible, in that case, there is no room for further consideration, and it is over. Don't divide by zero, don't think about it. That's it.
However, there is a solid theory that enables division by zero. Then, if you are interested in what the possible world will look like, an unknown world will appear. As a result, the world is not a phantom, empty world.
Aristotle has discovered that it will open up a new world since the world of Euclid. It is so magnificent that it opens up a beautiful world, so we should think of it as a new discovery of the meaning of division.
Declaring that division by zero is possible, opening up a new world, and that conventional mathematics is flawed and embarrassing. -The cause of Reiwa innovation.
The value at the origin of the function y = 1 / x is zero, which is expressed as 1/0 = 0. If 1/0 is the conventional definition of a fraction, it is clearly a contradiction. Therefore, it is necessary to give a new meaning of 1/0 strictly, and it is necessary to show its effectiveness as evidence with many concrete examples.
That is the mathematical concept of division by zero.
A concrete example is typically expressed as follows, and the significance of its significance is apparent:
For the elementary functions, f(x) = 1/x, g(x) = tan x and h(n)= a^n/n (a > 0), we have:
f(0)=0, g(\pi/2) = 0 and h(0) = log a,
by the DBZC (division by zero calculus).
The division by zero method is a new mathematics because it always takes a finite fixed value as a singular point, where it should not be considered as a singular point, and where it is considered as a pole.
Although the above function value is basic, it is a singular point and the value could not be considered.
We are widely guiding the effectiveness of the operation:
He professes that modern mathematics is still flawed. It is clear that there are basic defects in function theory, differential equations, geometry, and algebra, and it has been eight years since the discovery. This will be a stain on world history:
Please look 1/0=0:
As Fundamental of Mathematics, the division by zero was known as the generalized Moore-Penrose solution of the fundamental equation: ax=b.
Look the simple evidence of its importance:
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
Look a simple video talk for its essence at some international conference:
https://media.cmd.gunma-u.ac.jp/media/Play/ef7ca967c3fd4dabb188128fd6038cb81d
Book was published:
INTRODUCTION TO THE
DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS
SABUROU SAITOH
January, 2021
https://www.scirp.org/book/DetailedInforOfABook.aspx?bookID=2746
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1649970889?ref=myi_title_dp
https://books.google.com.ua/books/about?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ
https://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/reproducingkerne/
以 上
Statement of the Institute for Regenerative Nuclear Research 614 (2021.3.28) Reasons for requesting revision of articles in mathematical communication, Japanese culture, state of the mathematical world, state of society; Mathematical Society of Japan, members of the media, is this all right?
In short, one of the journals of the Mathematical Society of Japan has officially requested correction of the contents of mathematics, but the current situation is that it continues to be ignored. With reference to this situation, I would like to mention related issues in accordance with the purpose of the statement of the Institute for Regenerative Nuclear Research, which has announced that it is trying to build a better society.
First of all, to all the people involved in the Mathematical Society of Japan and the media, freedom of speech is well guaranteed in Japan. Minority opinions are often taken up, and some people are not treated as information by some people. Opinions are not ignored due to various differences such as origin, position, background, gender, university of origin, etc. Of course, the organization and friends are important, but basically, you are taking the basic stance of being for the sake of the country and the world, so to speak, for the sake of society. It seems that the minority opinions often reflect valuable opinions, but efforts are being made to pick up valuable opinions.
In the letter to the editorial board, you can post your suggestions to the Mathematical Society of Japan, suggestions related to the mathematics world such as mathematics education, and your opinions in the letter column to the editorial board. Have you ever been hired? It is a principle that we will not notify you of acceptance or rejection, and it is a principle of adoption. If handled poorly, it would be censored. Adopting or rejecting without giving a reason may not respect the opinions of the minority. What is the posting rule for?
Isn't the problem mentioned from the perspective of mathematics and the honor of the mathematics world important?
In order to build a good society and a good nation, we are announcing that we want to reveal the truth of mathematics and contribute to the culture of the world.
Regenerative Nuclear Research Institute Statement 613 (2021.3.21) Embarrassing mistakes in mathematics, oversights of geniuses, people's beliefs; human beings are blind groups and appear to be unicellular groups
Why are they ignored? Isn't that important content? I want you to reveal the truth.
Since it is meaningless, it is considered to be ignored because it is small. Therefore, every day, we seek opinions from both inside and outside the country, and continue to reflect on and consider them.
On the contrary, it seems to us that it is full of insignificant research and information.
The content of the article mentioned requires that the truth of the clear result of mathematics be clarified first, depending on whether the mirror image is the origin or the point at infinity. It is a symbolic example, but it cannot be ignored because it is a long-standing historical problem of mathematics, a new discovery of division by zero, and extremely important content related to the basics of mathematics in general. Behind this, seven years have passed since the discovery, and he has repeatedly given lectures at the Mathematical Society of Japan, lectured at invited international conferences, and released video lectures at certain invited international conferences, and even his books have been published, not to mention papers. They even provide explanations that mean that the mathematical content of the mathematical communication is incorrect. I think that there is an article on mathematical communication that denies that fact. I have repeatedly stated that this is a shame not only for the world of mathematics but also for humankind.
Therefore, I think it is natural for a mathematician to ask for the truth.
Regarding the reason for the delay in understanding division by zero, I would like to give a frank impression from the perspective of improving the culture of the world.
I have a strong impression that division by zero is impossible at first, and I have a strong impression of refusal from the beginning because of my belief, and there is a human sexuality (saga) that I cannot escape from my belief. Free thinking is important in mathematics, and on the contrary, I have a deep belief.
Even if you find out on the way, there is a reality that you hesitate to correct the mistake and do not apologize while admitting or criticizing the mistake. Among them, there are quite a lot of people who do not know well, hide and criticize, or are silent when it becomes inconvenient, so to speak, they are treated like cowards. I have interacted with a considerable number of people, but few have frankly admitted their mistakes, and even fewer have been apologized. Therefore, it is considered that the world of the Internet is still full of inappropriate information. I think the common sense of the world is a stain on the mathematical world:
{\it Here is how I see the problem with prohibition on division by zero,
which is the biggest scandal in modern mathematics as you rightly pointed
out} (2017.10.14.08:55).
I think such a situation would be a shame and negligence in the mathematical and media worlds.
Those who are well understood that it was an important blind spot do not actively work on the evolution of mathematics, and are reluctant with the problems of the next generation. -This is probably because it is a big change and lacks a deep understanding. -Changes are easy, but changes to scholarly books are enormous. Since the missing part in the new mathematics is filled in, the correction will be enormous even if the new result is not included. However, even if you know the truth, you cannot make use of it. -It is brave to see the righteousness. I feel the weakness of love for Machi, the weakness of the truth, and the weakness of the heart that respects the truth.
Unfortunately, there is a reality that people are ignored from the beginning without looking at the contents of mathematics, whether because of a task or because of an unknown name. Certainly, almost all of the literature on division by zero is strange, and the impossibility is definite, so from the beginning, I can understand the feeling that it does not matter. However, there are cases such as the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, and in fact, it is considered to be correct in such cases. -However, you should look at the mathematics itself, and it is essentially not good to judge by yourself. Then I have to say that it is essentially lacking in the scientific spirit. In addition, respect for diverse opinions, strange opinions, and novel opinions may be the basic existence of researchers.
Also, in order to pursue the truth, a thorough discussion should be the basic spirit of important research, but immediately stop the discussion and give an opinion of the other party, who is not interested, is not interested, cuts off the exchange. Isn't it a bad world to ignore? In search of the truth, thorough discussions and exchanges seem to be extremely basic in research.
Even in the mathematics world, there is a strong sense of face-to-face competition, a sense of competition, and a sense of fellowship, and surprisingly, I feel that the world of mathematics is getting worse beyond the pursuit of the truth of mathematics. Isn't the spirit of love for Machi important in the mathematical world? I want to thoroughly seek the truth of mathematics. I think the mathematical world must be open to society.
Recently, I can remember the scenes of the seminars by Yusaku Komatsu, Mitsuru Ozawa, and Suita, who I received at Tokyo Institute of Technology when I was a graduate student and a trainee. In a nutshell, it is a nostalgic training era that has been thoroughly trained with the strict spirit of mathematics. In such a sloppy mathematics situation and the response of the mathematics world, I am sorry for my teachers and I can not keep my honor, and I am constantly feeling fierce about the current situation.
Reiwa innovation is carried out, and now is the time to evolve world history with the division by zero method originating in Japan. The idea of space since Aristotle and Euclid must be changed, and calculus must be revised. It can be said that trigonometric functions are also full of holes. A prominent example is the fact that the mirror image of the origin is the origin, not the point at infinity.
From the blog:
What is the Mathematical Society of Japan that cannot clarify the truth?
Can you say that you are a math researcher and a math teacher because you cannot correct what is wrong?
The math world that doesn't fix this seems to be ashamed every day. I woke up and felt a little intense emotions. Let's go to the hideout early for training.
2021.3.26.5: 02
There was zero at the point at infinity and beyond infinity. I did not notice.
It seems to be a small problem, but it is already clear that it is an event in the history of the world where the geocentric theory replaces the heliocentric theory, which turns the world upside down.
2021.3.25.5: 28
that's all
Regenerative Nuclear Research Institute Statement 613 (2021.3.21) Embarrassing mistakes in mathematics, oversights of geniuses, people's beliefs; human beings are blind groups and appear to be unicellular groups
The delay in understanding division by zero is quite strange, and I'm wondering why. First, I will explain the essence of the most principle of division by zero.
The discovery that the value at the origin of the basic function y = 1 / x is zero can be said to be the essence of the discovery of division by zero.
It is said that the value of the basic function at the origin is zero.
The function diverges to infinity when approaching the origin from the positive direction, and diverges to minus infinity when approaching zero from the negative direction.
Those are facts, and of course modern mathematics is.
However, although they describe the situation when approaching the origin, they are
The problem is different from what the value at the origin is. No matter how close you are to the origin, it is a different matter whether the value at the origin is. I don't know if so-called continuity is established or something like that. That's why I didn't think about the value at the origin. I have vaguely come up with something like infinity. In complex analysis, we have considered the point at infinity, but it is strange that the value at the origin is infinite like a number. It can be said that it is really strange to connect a value that is not a number with an equal sign. Shouldn't the equal sign have to be a number? 1/0 = INFINITY is really strange.
In fact, it is already famous as a mistake of the genius Euler. Since division by zero is said to be 1/0 = 0, many people are amazed, and in fact, the people who heard and changed their facial expressions were domestic, Western, Asian, Russian, African, South American, and Arab people. The same is true for us. However, it was necessary to give a new meaning of 1/0. That is the new concept and meaning of division by zero. It can be said that the important point of division by zero, the blind spot, has been confusing and obscuring the approaching value and the approaching value for a long time. As is well known, division by zero is easily proved impossible in the ordinary sense, so even the geniuses of the world, Newton, Einstein, Euler, and Gauss, could not grasp the essence of division by zero. The genius Ramanojan had an intuition that 0/0 = 1, but the meaning of division by zero could not be grasped.
It's an important point, so I would like to quote it to deepen my understanding by referring to an email with a certain person:
First, when f (z) = 1 / z (z ≠ 0) is set as the fundamentals of functions and their limits,
f (z) is not defined with z = 0, and lim_ (z → 0) f (z) = ∞ is obvious as the limit.
At this time, when defining a new value at z = 0 and defining an extended function,
What kind of function value is taken at z = 0 is free.
When considering the Riemann surface in functional theory, it is convenient for continuity and conformality.
It is natural to define f (0) = ∞. (1/0 = ∞)
On the other hand, as suggested by the teacher, when considering various applications,
The theory that defines f (0) = 0 is also important. (1/0 = 0)
This is important, but it is clear that mathematics gives the definition and meaning of 1/0 = 0 in the Mu-Apenrose general inverse, Takahashi's uniqueness theorem, body structure, and more than 1100 concrete examples.
The idea is extremely easy to describe and the content and definition are simple.
At the level, it is natural from elementary school students. Just rethink the definition and meaning of division.
Therefore, he says that mathematics is embarrassing.
This is not only the shame of the mathematical world, but the shame of humankind's world history.
In the above, it is natural to define what kind of function value is taken at z = 0 as f (0) = ∞: It is strange to set the value to ∞, which is not a number. It means lim_ (z → 0) f (z) = ∞, and if you don't consider the extreme operation, you can say that ∞ is meaningless. We need to remember the definition of ∞.
It means that the mirror image of the circle at the center of the circle is the center itself, but what you should not think of as infinity or point at infinity is the basis of mathematics education in analysis. The reason is that the value that approaches and the value there are generally different, which is the ultimate idea, and it is basically important. However, in the mirror image, everyone did not notice it, and it was ambiguous for a long time.
I've been vague.
Unfortunately, the value approaching the origin is different from the value at the origin, and at the origin
An amazing number, zero, was defined that didn't look like it.
It can be said that it has been since Aristotle. Even if I point out this properly, it has not been corrected for 7 years, and even if I regularly point out the fact of the old mistake in the mathematical communication of the Mathematical Society of Japan, it seems that I can continue to ignore it even after more than a year. The same is true for the function theory subcommittee. It is not like a mathematician to have an attitude of avoiding something like seeing a world that everyone dislikes, so it seems that no one is responsible for mathematics education and research. I will end up. We are asking you to reveal the truth of mathematics. There is a situation in which the mathematics we teach has a basic flaw and is ignored even though it is repeatedly stated that it is in an embarrassing state. From the conscience of mathematicians, we must reveal the truth in the name of the beauty of mathematics.
-The cause of Reiwa innovation.
I've been wondering why my understanding isn't progressing, but I feel that I'm deeply absorbed in my specialty, closed to unicellular thinking and vision, and feel uneasy about the basics. I will. I am busy and have lost my mind, and I wonder if I can do good education and research in such a state.
Division by zero is a well-known problem with a long history, but there are many geniuses and geniuses in the world, but once it is considered impossible, the geniuses think that way and are human beings who can not get out of that thought. You will be informed of the sex (saga) of. Therefore, it is important to refer widely to the opinions of amateurs. In fact, our discovery was largely triggered by a question from an amateur.
In the world of mathematics, unlike political society, mathematical truth is considered to exist objectively and absolutely, so I hope that the truth will be revealed from the standpoint of pursuing the truth. I will.
The current mathematics is embarrassing, and it is thought that it is similar to the social situation in which the treatment and response of society are embarrassing, just denying the heliocentric theory and ignoring or criticizing it. Shouldn't one seek mathematical truth? It is clear that the problem is not irrelevant mathematics, but the basics of mathematics and the world view are directly related. What about eternity and infinity?
that's all
Statement of the Institute for Regenerative Nuclear Research 612 (2021.3.19) We have discovered-elementary results of mathematics
We have found that, in a natural sense, it breaks at zero.
We have found that infinity is represented by zero.
We found that the slope of a utility pole standing straight was zero.
We have found that the y-axis gradient is zero.
We have found that the value at the center of a right-angled hyperbola takes the value at the center.
We have found that the singularity takes a meaningful value.
We have discovered that infinite distance is in line with the origin.
We have found that there is zero beyond infinity.
We have found that everything starts at zero and returns to zero.
We found that the mirror image of the center of the circle is the center itself.
We have discovered that zero has the property of showing the impossible.
We have discovered that zero may indicate that it does not exist.
We have found that Euclidean geometry is flawed in infinitely distant ideas.
We have discovered that both straight lines and points can be regarded as circles with the origin at the center and zero curvature.
We discovered the basic arithmetic concept and word called division by zero DBZC. Published it in a book:
INTRODUCTION TO THE
DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS
SABUROU SAITOH
January, 2021
https://www.scirp.org/book/DetailedInforOfABook.aspx?bookID=2746
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1649970889?ref=myi_title_dp
https://books.google.com.ua/books/about?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=BnkZEAAAQBAJ
These are emotional and emotional expressions for amateurs and the general public. Accurately, strictly speaking, I think that it is described in the above book in a self-contained manner.
that's all
Reproducing Kernel Research Institute Statement 609 (2021.3.11): Geometry of complex numbers and circles-Shimane University, commentary by Toshihiro Nakanishi (Mathematics Communication, February 2020 issue) Request for correction of description
Here, the description means that the central mirror image of the circle is the point at infinity.
It is a request to change the description that the mirror image of the center is the center itself.
The detailed background is
Regenerative Nuclear Research Institute Statement 551 (2020.3.8) Members of the Function Theory Subcommittee--
I think that the current undergraduate function theory textbook and educational content have basic flaws.
When
Regeneration Nuclear Research Institute Statement 606 (2021.3.1): New world has been opened up, seeking exploration of the new world:
From Riemann sphere to Daeumler – Puha horn torus; 2021.2.22.5:33
or
From Euclid – Riemann to Daeumler – Puha horn torus model; 2021.2.22.07:30
See. The request for consideration was given to the author himself and the editorial manager, Mr. Hiroo Tokunaga, the editorial chairman of "Mathematics Communication" (Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:22:54 +0900). , I haven't been contacted at all since then.
What is the reason for the correction request?
Since mathematicians cannot correct mistakes, it is thought that the reason why the Mathematical Society of Japan does not correct mistakes is because they misunderstand that it can be either, or because they understand the mistakes.
Therefore, I want you to clarify the truth. I think that it is against the honor and duty of the mathematician of the person concerned.
On a beautiful spring morning, the spirit of mathematics was trained at a high-class seminar attended by Professor Yusaku Komatsu, Professor Ozawa, and Professor Suita at Tokyo Institute of Technology. The teachers were of a fulfilling age, and a good mathematician, Professor Oikawa of the University of Tokyo, etc. often participated, and the people who were called assistants at that time were also strict.
I woke up with such a thought when I thought that the current state of function theory was strange. Why can't this be clarified? Why don't you ask for the truth. I will not clarify. The classical idea of a mirror image is wrong, and there are fundamental flaws in the foundation of modern mathematics. I want you to find out the truth. Can you say that you are a mathematician because you can't do that? I can't forgive it in the spirit of mathematics we received. That is the unyielding conscience of the researcher. 2021.3.6.5: 25 (published on the blog).
Seven years have passed since the discovery of division by zero, and I have repeatedly given lectures at the Mathematical Society of Japan, and have met as individually as possible for each academic society to seek understanding of division by zero. Therefore, there is no legitimate criticism from anywhere in the world, and the video lecture of the invited international conference has been released, and the book has also been published. However, there are still widespread situations in which a considerable number of people are misunderstood as described above. Since it is related not only to the problem of mirror images but also to the world view and the basics of basic mathematics in general, the Mathematical Society of Japan is responsible for clarifying the truth and certifying the facts as an institution responsible for mathematics research and education. I think it will be a basic obligation.
I would like to continue to investigate the truth with the conscience of mathematicians, and with the honor of mathematics, strive for the cause of Reiwa innovation.
The results were specifically mentioned in ISAAC 2015, Plenary Lectures on Macau, and officially published:
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications - Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182. (Springer). that's all
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\title{\bf Announcement 600: The 7th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$ \\
(2021.2.2)\\ For Founding a new International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus
}
\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\
Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\
Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\
{\bf kbdmm360@yahoo.co.jp}\\
}
\date{2021.1.26.}
\maketitle
The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space since Aristotele (BC384 – BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century – ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta (598 – 668 ?).
However, note that the division by zero $1/0=0$ having a mysterious long history was, in fact, known as the generalized Moore-Penrose solution of the fundamental equation: $ax=b$.
\medskip
The division by zero calculus is a new and fundamental concept, and it may be defined simply as follows:
\medskip
For a function $y = f(x)$ which is $n$ order differentiable at $x =a$, we will {\bf define} the value
of the function, for $n \ge 0$
$$
\frac{f(x)}{(x -a)^n}
$$
at the point $x=a$ by the value
$$
\frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n!}.
$$
For the important case of $n=1$,
$$
\frac{f(x)}{x -a} |_{x=a} = f^\prime(a).
$$
\medskip
Look the simple evidence of its importance:
\medskip
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
\medskip
Look a simple video talk for its essence at some international conference:
\medskip
https://media.cmd.gunma-u.ac.jp/media/Play/ef7ca967c3fd4dabb188128fd6038cb81d
\medskip
For the detailed information, the book will be published soon as:
\medskip
S. Saitoh, Introduction to the Division by Zero Calculus, Scientific Research Publishing (2021) (in press).
\medskip
Some publisher of London is wishing some publication of a new International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus. The topics may be identified as the division by zero calculus. However, the contents will be related to our serious problems:
\medskip
What is ZERO?
\medskip
What is Division by Zero, in some serious sense?
\medskip
The problems may be related to mathematical philosophy, long history and our culture.
The starting of the International Journal will not be still easy at this moment, however, for its importance, we would like to manage to found the new Journal in some near future. So, we will need the kind help of the leading mathematical scientists.
\medskip
How will be the related physicists?
\medskip
Computer scientists?
\medskip
We attached the journal style (in a rough way) in the below. You can express your positive suggestions and comments for the style.
For your great contributions in connection with this topics, how will be your editorial member?
However, the final decision may be done by the publisher.
We wish to have your positive answer with your valuable suggestions and comments.
If you kindly are interested in the editorial member, then please send your simple CV with your wishes for some estimation by the publisher.
Please kindly forward this announcement to your related colleagues that you think suitable persons.
\bigskip
{\it For your starting email, I think as follows:
Many thanks for your email. The journals suggested by you are very interesting and new to the subject area. We accept to publish both journals under your editorship. We need following things from your side for preparing the sample web page of the journals.
1. Aim and Scope , Instructions to Authors, List of the editorial board members, Frequency of the journal.
Of course, they are important. However, for Frequency of the journal, we should consider it in a new type. We should not loss our valuable time for us and for the authors. We all do not like to loss our time for publication and refereeing time. This will mean that we should not fix Frequency of the journal. When a paper was accepted officially, then, soon the paper should be presented on line. So, some time, we can give the number for an accepted paper. If you wish to publish the papers in some Journal style or book, you will be able to publish them in some papers with a suitable page numbers. How will be this idea?
2. The journal will be free for the readers (open Access publications). The journal will not charge any fee from the authors for getting published in the journal.
Fine: However is it possible?
3. We need some sample images from your end to prepare the cover page for the journals.
We can consider them with computer graphics.
For a paper style, how will be it in a free style, we request it PDF in order not to
loss any valuable time for us and for the authors.
I think: this is an ideal style
viXra:2010.0228 submitted on 2020-10-28 21:39:06,
Division by Zero Calculus and Euclidean Geometry – Revolution in Euclidean Geometry
The problem is no refereeing procedures. We are requested to have some authority, some check system for the paper. This is a problem only.
I think you will be able to consider new journals in this spirit.
The publisher already gave a very good sample manuscript form by LaTex; very simple way. No problem.
4. We will provide the support to the editor to check the plagiarism in the articles via turnitin software.
We will request minor corrections formally for the accepted paper.}
\bigskip
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{boyer}
C. B. Boyer, An early reference to division by zero, The Journal of the American Mathematical Monthly, {\bf 50} (1943), (8), 487- 491. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from the JSTOR database.
\bibitem{cs}
L. P. Castro and S. Saitoh, Fractional functions and their representations, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory {\bf7} (2013), no. 4, 1049-1063.
\bibitem{kmsy}
M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,
New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,
Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.
\bibitem{ms16}
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Matrices and division by zero $z/0=0$,
Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, {\bf 6}(2016), 51-58
Published Online June 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt
\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.
\bibitem{mms18}
T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,
$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics. {\bf 230} (2018), 293-305.
\bibitem{msy}
H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and M.Yamada,
Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1–8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html
\bibitem{mos}
H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,
International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, {\bf 2}8(2017); Issue 1, 1-16.
\bibitem{oku18}
H. Okumura, Is It Really Impossible To Divide By Zero? Biostat Biometrics Open Acc J. 2018; 7(1): 555703.
DOI: 10.19080/BBOJ.2018.07.555703.
\bibitem{o}
H. Okumura, Wasan geometry with the division by 0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06947 International Journal of Geometry. {\bf 7}(2018), No. 1, 17-20.
\bibitem{ok1812}
H. Okumura,
An Analogue to Pappus Chain theorem with Division by Zero, Forum Geom., {\bf 18} (2018), 409–412.
\bibitem{okumurafield}
H. Okumura, To Divide by Zero is to Multiply by Zero, viXra: 1811.0283 submitted on 2018-11-18 20:46:54.
\bibitem{okumura19a}
H. Okumura, A Remark of the Definition of $0/0=0$ by Brahmagupta, viXra:1902.0221 submitted on 2019-02-12 23:41:31.
\bibitem{okumura20}
H. Okumura, A Chain of Circles Touching a Circle and Its Tangent and Division by Zero,
viXra:2001.0034 submitted on 2020-01-03 01:08:58.
\bibitem{okumura20b}
H. Okumura, Pappus Chain and Division by Zero, viXra:2001.0123 replaced on 2020-01-08 06:57:36.
\bibitem{osm}
H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of $0$ and $\infty$,
Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), {\bf 1}(2017), 70-77.
\bibitem{os}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh, The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04961 (2017.11.14).
\bibitem{os18april}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Harmonic Mean and Division by Zero,
Dedicated to Professor Josip Pe\v{c}ari\'{c} on the occasion of his 70th birthday, Forum Geometricorum, {\bf 18} (2018), 155—159.
\bibitem{os18}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Remarks for The Twin Circles of Archimedes in a Skewed Arbelos by H. Okumura and M. Watanabe, Forum Geometricorum, {\bf 18}(2018), 97-100.
\bibitem{os18e}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Applications of the division by zero calculus to Wasan geometry.
GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH ON CLASSICAL AND MODERN GEOMETRIES” (GJARCMG), {\bf 7}(2018), 2, 44–49.
\bibitem{os1811}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Wasan Geometry and Division by Zero Calculus,
Sangaku Journal of Mathematics (SJM), {\bf 2 }(2018), 57–73.
\bibitem{ps18}
S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,
Division by zero calculus and differential equations. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics. {\bf 230} (2018), 399-418.
\bibitem{romig}
H. G. Romig, Discussions: Early History of Division by Zero,
American Mathematical Monthly, {\bf 3}1, No. 8. (Oct., 1924), 387-389.
\bibitem{s14}
S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87–95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/
\bibitem{s16}
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182.
\bibitem{ttk}
S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi, Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.
\bibitem{ann179}
Announcement 179 (2014.8.30): Division by zero is clear as z/0=0 and it is fundamental in mathematics.
\bibitem{ann185}
Announcement 185 (2014.10.22): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann237}
Announcement 237 (2015.6.18): A reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$ by geometrical optics.
\bibitem{ann246}
Announcement 246 (2015.9.17): An interpretation of the division by zero $1/0=0$ by the gradients of lines.
\bibitem{ann247}
Announcement 247 (2015.9.22): The gradient of y-axis is zero and $\tan (\pi/2) =0$ by the division by zero $1/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann250}
Announcement 250 (2015.10.20): What are numbers? – the Yamada field containing the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann252}
Announcement 252 (2015.11.1): Circles and
curvature – an interpretation by Mr.
Hiroshi Michiwaki of the division by
zero $r/0 = 0$.
\bibitem{ann281}
Announcement 281 (2016.2.1): The importance of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{ann282}
Announcement 282 (2016.2.2): The Division by Zero $z/0=0$ on the Second Birthday.
\bibitem{ann293}
Announcement 293 (2016.3.27): Parallel lines on the Euclidean plane from the viewpoint of division by zero 1/0=0.
\bibitem{ann300}
Announcement 300 (2016.05.22): New challenges on the division by zero z/0=0.
\bibitem{ann326}
Announcement 326 (2016.10.17): The division by zero z/0=0 – its impact to human beings through education and research.
\bibitem{ann352}
Announcement 352 (2017.2.2): On the third birthday of the division by zero z/0=0.
\bibitem{ann354}
Announcement 354 (2017.2.8): What are $n = 2,1,0$ regular polygons inscribed in a disc? — relations of $0$ and infinity.
\bibitem{362}
Announcement 362 (2017.5.5): Discovery of the division by zero as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$
\bibitem{380}
Announcement 380 (2017.8.21): What is the zero?
\bibitem{388}
Announcement 388 (2017.10.29): Information and ideas on zero and division by zero (a project).
\bibitem{409}
Announcement 409 (2018.1.29.): Various Publication Projects on the Division by Zero.
\bibitem{410}
Announcement 410 (2018.1 30.): What is mathematics? — beyond logic; for great challengers on the division by zero.
\bibitem{412}
Announcement 412 (2018.2.2.): The 4th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{433}
Announcement 433 (2018.7.16.): Puha’s Horn Torus Model for the Riemann Sphere From the Viewpoint of Division by Zero.
\bibitem{448}
Announcement 448 (2018.8.20): Division by Zero;
Funny History and New World.
\bibitem{454}
Announcement 454 (2018.9.29): The International Conference on Applied Physics and Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, October 22-23.
\bibitem{460}
Announcement 460 (2018.11.06): Change the Poor Idea to the Definite Results For the Division by Zero – For the Leading Mathematicians.
\bibitem{461}
Announcement 461 (2018.11.10): An essence of division by zero and a new axiom.
\bibitem{471}
Announcement 471(2019.2.2): The 5th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\bibitem{478}
Announcement 478(2019.3.4): Who did derive first the division by zero $1/0$ and the division by zero calculus $\tan(\pi/2)=0, \log 0=0$ as the outputs of a computer?
\bibitem{540}
Announcement 540(2020.2.2): The 6th birthday of the division by zero $z/0=0$.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
prepare the article according to the sample style of the journal.
https://romanpub.com/dbzc.php
Thanks again,
rkernel 